The fact this piece is listed in the section it is, indicates who it is dedicated to. It is well an important subject that lays bare the stupidity and superficiality of people like the Slacks, their deceased “partners in crime”, Eleanor and Doris, and other religious hypocrites. This is aimed at that “religious hypocrite” target, who perhaps have not heard, considered/pondered a saying I saw displayed in a church last Sunday, “You can choose your choices but you cannot choose the consequences of your choices.”
The real kicker follows, “The thing about our choices is after we have made them, they turn around and make us.”
Regrets always follow those who refuse to face the truth upon which they presuppose the decisions they make, using instead self interest and the nurturing of their selfish base human character and yielding to their greed. This I am sure was the process followed by the Slacks in their rejection of all that is good in trade for their foolish lusts of greed, selfishness and ill gotten gains. The consequences are showing fruit, and will impact them, their children, and their children’s children etc
What they are trying to do, and foolishly think what they have/will be successful in doing was presupposed on the models by the thousands we have seen whereby injustice, thefts, deceit, malice and evil machinations form part and parcel of wills, often influenced by evil people as Eleanor Slack for the vile realization of her own wicked ends, enabled and facilitated by her greedy, selfish, dishonest religious hypocritical brood. For sure, it is one thing to ignore a will made by a twisted, malicious fool, who left one person out in the common beneficiary acceptance group of ALL nephew and nieces, but yet another to steal a part of that person’s right to earnings promised him by liars. The substance and amount of the contributions to the estate in question made by that person over 55 years of his existence working intermittently when called, for Percy and Doris Kennedy, was so much, the arrangement, understood on both sides, was mutually acceptable to both and based on trust, that remuneration woudl come at the “end.” The deal/ trust broken by the lies, “UNDUE INFLUENCE OF OTHERS BUT PRIMARILY ELEANOR SLACK, leaves no doubt as to the real character of the participants, one and all religious hypocrites who denied their God, betrayed dozens of people, affected the well being of same, and stand silently, but by their nefarious deeds, accused, convicted and condemned, though this “condemnation” will take on the critical spiritual aspect at their “end” and perhaps in this life. Scriptures carry ominous warnings and curses on people who acquire ill gotten gains at the expense of innocent people and to be true, what the Slacks, and Doris have done, is more vile than what an armed robber would do in stealing from others. A robber makes no secret of his intent, but the despicable sneaky cowardly Doris and Eleanor were no better, and in fact, far worse, than the most wanton thief.
There are two reasons that people remain silent if accused of some evil deed. The first group who do so are largely innocent and do not want to dignify the false accusation/defamations/slanders. This happens a lot in this day and age of the internet where every criminal liar, especially leftists, seek to silence/attack/punish anyone with an alternate opinion to their embraced corrupt fascist bent. Suffering fools and liars will always be the lot of any who oppose the politically correct bigots of the left and needs to be accepted as coming with the role of telling the truth, being open, and opposing all that is evil.
The other group are silent because they are guilty and know that there is no defense to their position, as their actions have already seen to it that the labels applied to them are true. This then is the reason for the silence of the nefarious, duplicious Slacks. They realize that opening the mess of fraud and duplicity in this situation will indict them and end with their having to release from their selfish greedy grip, monies belonging to me FOR WAGES EARNED.
They made a big mistake in thinking I would not challenge/publicize this injustice, and though I have just started and expended a lot of time and passion, utilizing rough language and demonstrating contempt, anger and even hatred, there is no other alternative but to occupy the ranks of people, more than a few I know, who have suffered in silence the same betrayal, thefts, duplicity, and ugliness of relatives who have proven beyond a doubt by their “fruits” that they are no better than the common criminal. Yet, it has just started.
So Slacks, let us look at just a few of the consequences you all, as well as dishonest Doris and your vile twisted dysfunctional mother Eleanor have reaped:
- discreditation/trashing of their professed “love of God” and all that is right and demonstration they were but religious hypocrites, probably in a state of condemnationv
- eternal consequences of their vile selfish actions all for the love of mammon (as it is written, “The love of money is the root of all evil.”)v
- theft from not only myself, but from my parents, four children, my six grandchildren, my great grandchildren, etc etc
- duplitious betrayal of my parents
- emotional abuse suffered by my father due to the “plan” to defraud me and others
- public embarrassment that the exposure of sin always brings to religious hypocritical people who falsely express a committment to live properly and do the will of God
- violation of several of the “Ten Commandments” and principles expostulated by Jesus Christ throughout the New Testament, and principles throughout the Old Testament
- demonstration in real life that the ugliness of vile sin manifests as often or more, in matters of integrity and honesty, among religious people as much or more than in those secularly inclined
- violation of the clear command to not steal/defraud and imposed guilt by their actions of defrauding a man of his wages
- betrayal of Percy Kennedy using lies, deceptions, and duplicity by Doris and Eleanor, enabled by Mendel Slack, Sharleen Van Woezik, and Beth Slack Bradley
I will stop there, not only because these are serious enough and the list is much longer, but because I am becoming angry again, and hateful towards such sub human people that I am ashamed to admit are relatives. Yet I will mention more things the Slacks in their greed and selfishness have refused to consider, in committing their frauds, thefts, and criminality against me.
Just imagine if you know someone who has been generous as commanded in scripture, and is inhibited in being more generous by the amount of financial resources he has. Imagine that plans to financially benefit a young married couple have been compromised by lack of money. Imagine that plans to send grandchildren to a Christian school for an education have been identically compromised. Imagine that more substantive support to good political parties, pro life causes, homeless street children/youth, etc have been compromised by the same lack of resources.
Now consider the situation herein that if a marriage fails because of the financial difficulty and duress imposed on a young married couple with two children, all because a man was cheated of his rightful wages, does not the sin of theft against him by others, put them in the category of culpability? Does the well being and salvation of little children that is also compromised by a man who would send them to a Christian school not indict the thieves who defrauded that same man of his rightful wages? Does the ability to outreach homeless children, defend unborn innocent babies, etc, not hinge on the financial support such organizations require to do their good work?
This is but the tip of the iceberg, and the Slacks, Doris Kennedy and Eleanor are ALL under the indictment of their vile deeds committed against me and by association, those I have and would benefit from RIGHTFUL WAGES DEFRAUDED FROM ME BY THE SLACKS. In synergistic combination, there are many other triggered events that theft and fraud committed by them that have/are occurring, and not in a good way.
Of course they do not care, and have joined the crowd of selfish, greedy, vile people in the criminal and dysfunctional society who will by any means, grasp every cent they can even on the backs of and at the detriment of others. It is these realities that has taken me to a place of disrespect, despite, and anger against people involved in defrauding me.
The gain for these miscreantic religious hypocrites who have allowed their selfishness and greed/love of the damned dollar to ensnare them into aiding and abetting all that is evil, is an amount of about $17000. each. For their 30 pieces of silver, they have joined the ranks of Judas in betraying Jesus through the vile act of fraud. Guess it is a good trade off eh Beth, to deal your integrity, reputation, and salvation for the pleasures of sin for a season? How about you Mendel, does it feel good to look at the money you gained at the expense of your own integrity? And Sharleen, your pitiful act of patting the cheap coffin of Percy, making sure Doris saw your crocodile tears might have fooled a fool, but what you have done in the way of sin towards dozens of people is a disgrace that no number of “hail Marys” will wipe out.
I am not done computing the total fraud against myself and others in this entire sordid affair but am getting there and will post that when I get it.
The decisions you have all made have “made” the lot of you and what that is, certainly is not at all pretty. You have all a right to your opinions no matter how colored, but none of you have the right to use those flawed opinions to defraud others. The reality clearly seen by neighbors is that not a damned one of you religious hypocrites did a lick of work yet you all see fit to defraud a man of his rightful wages, steal his money, and pretend the whole matter is not worthy of consideration.
Back to you Beth, I am aware that you have like many other selfish ingrates, erected subjective walls to block your view of justice, truth and right. Your attitude, and filthy disposition, has been to impose that on the other stooges in the group to deflect justice and ignore the real situation. Your summary lie of “Well that is what Doris wanted so that is the end of the matter” which you used form the first, and connived to persuade the rest to cooperate with the fraud, is a testimony to your greed and filthy character. I never forgot the time you and your parents stayed at our place in town, and you pissed in a pot and put my small teddy bear in it. Whatever possessed you to do so I have never understood, but it seemed to set the stage for your present character to repay evil for good as you have done recently to my parents, and others in your wretched existence. Rationalizing fraud is a thing many do, but few do it as rapidly and ignorantly as you do.
Indeed, as Elbert Hubbard said, which applies to you for sure, “The recipe for perpetual ignorance is to be satisfied with your opinions and content with your knowledge.” It is also the recipe to be a liar, ingrate and criminal in many cases, including yours.
Your opinion on the matter at hand has been founded on self interest, greed, dishonesty and treachery, and as such, has been imposed with a great amount of evilness.
I thus have to judge you all on what your opinions and choices have made of you, and it is downright ugly. Too bad the lot of you ingrates did not formulate your opinions on Truth, and also make your decisions on Justice. Had Doris, Eleanor and the rest of the damned lot of you been possessed of charity, equity, fairness, justice and decency, we would not be here today.
Once again evil in the lives of so called religious people has for the moment triumphed, making a mockery of their religion and exposing them as frauds. There is but one way out, and as time progresses it will be harder and harder for you all to extricate yourselves from this disgrace and shameful mess, and that is to make things right. That is the ONLY way to see the end of the matter.
Clearly my quest for justice is related to wage defraudment, for I am one of several who could not depend on integrity from Doris to do what is right as she was lacking sorely in that as well as in many other good things. The differences on the Slack opinion on this and my own, is clearly a difference of principles. It is certainly not hard to see who occupies the high ground on this.
On a personal note, some wonder why I did not discreetly approach the Slacks about this matter in the beginning. Truth is I did, by way of a mailing to ALL those involved. They were ALL returned unopened, except two which I am sure were sent to the other Slacks who quickly agreed to the only recourse that would enable them to keep the money as the legal/moral/just provisions of my case were undeniable and they knew they would be unable to do anything but make things right. Others wonder why I do not remain civil and low key in this matter and ask for their provenance.
That would be wrong, for the matter is all about earned wages and an agreement made that was not kept by the lying duplitious Doris. I would ask anyone if they had their car stolen, if they would sit down and deal with the damned thief to get it back. I am owed monies, from them and I do not make deals to acquire what thieves stole from me.
Another point that comes up is that those who designate things to beneficiaries have that right. I accept that, and even though it demonstrates what a duplitious, miserable, hypocritical and malignant waif Doris is to exclude me as the only nephew/niece in her will, this is not about her right to be an insufferable uncharitable waif. It is instead my right to wages earned intermittently over 55 years by agreement to be remunerated at the “end.”
This is a straight cut matter and before the end of it all there will be serious fallout for the Slacks, though I am wondering how a true minister predicted this would happen to me. Did he know of the Slacks, or Doris, or was he just basing his prediction on the many times he had seen such injustices occur in his lifetime?
I have publicly invited any of the Slacks to input to me their positions and defence if any which I will have posted here but they have not participated, mainly because they are aware they have no defense and that “Mene mene teckel upharsin” applies to every damned one of them. It is all about their greed, and selfishness, and that is the problem.
At this point there can be no low key settlement as disrepute started for them the very day the contents of the will became known and neighbors started calling me to express their disgust and regrets that I had been cheated. They ALL knew the injustice as they are silent witnesses to my frequent attendance at the farm all my life working. (logging, firewood cutting/hauling, haying, gardening, maple syrup production, etc)
One would have thought that having had a father as a minister, a mother who was a constant church attendee, and being in church attendance all their lives, that somewhere in their existence at least one of them would have retained an ounce of moral regard to the provisions of the scriptures taught them, that would have influenced them to do the right thing. Apparently not, as indicated by their wholesale greed, fraud, thefts, and love of the damned dollar. Eleanor and Doris were away worse, and perhaps this was a large part of the problem.
I have no use for any damned one of these hypocrites and have estranged them from my existence as counseled in scriptures. They have become anathema to all that is good, a disgrace to their religion, and a blight upon their families.
Truly their decisions and choices have made them into something ugly.
Edward Kennedy